The Art of Letting Others Be Human: Growing Through Imperfect Relationships
- Brittney-Nichole Connor-Savarda
- 3 days ago
- 5 min read

We've been sold an incomplete story about relationships: that healthy ones are characterized by constant harmony, and that if we're doing it "right," there won't be friction, disappointment, or moments where we wonder if we've made a mistake in letting this person close.
While unconditional acceptance is possible—there have been rare individuals who've embodied it fully—for most of us still navigating our ego-driven patterns, this ideal becomes a trap. We use it as evidence that we're failing, that our struggles mean something is fundamentally wrong. This doesn't just set us up for disappointment—it prevents us from experiencing the kind of growth that comes from honestly navigating the messy reality of loving imperfect people while still being imperfect ourselves.
The truth is, we will disappoint the people we love, and they will disappoint us. We'll forget something important to them. We'll be unavailable when they need us. We'll say something thoughtless or fail to show up the way they hoped—and they'll do the same to us. In those moments, we have a choice: we can take it as evidence that something is fundamentally broken, or we can recognize it as an invitation to grow in our capacity to be with human limitation—both theirs and our own.
Working With Our Human Limitations
Our ego believes it must protect us, control outcomes, and defend its version of how things should be. It resists acceptance when someone's behavior threatens our sense of safety or challenges our expectations. This is the reality most of us are working with.
Real intimacy requires showing up as whole people with preferences, limits, and reactions—not pretending we've transcended our humanity. When we force ourselves to accept everything to appear "evolved," we're not creating health. We're making a different kind of performance. The work isn't about reaching some ideal of perfect acceptance, but about honestly engaging with our own limitations while staying connected.
The deepest connections aren't built on never disappointing each other. They're built on what happens after the disappointment—whether we can stay present with the discomfort, communicate honestly about our own shortcomings and hurts, and allow the relationship to become more real rather than retreat into safety or defensiveness.
Sitting With Discomfort
Most of us are terrified of relational discomfort. The moment tension arises, we rush to resolve it or escape it entirely. We apologize before we've understood what happened. We distance ourselves to avoid feeling disappointed again. We create stories about what someone's behavior means rather than simply sitting with the uncomfortable feeling.
But discomfort is information. That knot in your stomach when your partner dismisses something you care about, the sting when a friend cancels plans again—these feelings are telling you something worth knowing.
The art is in staying with the discomfort long enough to understand what it's revealing, without immediately acting on it or demanding that it be fixed. When we can say, "I feel disappointed right now, and I'm going to sit with this feeling before I decide what it means," we give ourselves space to respond rather than react.
Sometimes the discomfort reveals that we need to communicate a boundary. Sometimes it shows us where we're carrying unrealistic expectations. But we can't access that wisdom if we're constantly running from the feeling.
Releasing the Need to Change Others
Perhaps the most liberating practice in relationships is letting go of the idea of who someone should be and accepting who they actually are right now.
This doesn't mean resignation or tolerating mistreatment. It means recognizing that our frustration often stems from our insistence that they be different. We want our partner to be more emotionally expressive, our parent to be more validating, and our friend to be more reliable. Beneath that want is often an unspoken demand: "You must change for me to be okay."
But people change on their own timeline, through their own process, and often not in the ways we hope. When we make our peace conditional on someone else's transformation, we've handed them all our power.
The shift happens when we ask: "Can I accept this person as they are today, knowing they may never change this thing I wish was different?" If the answer is yes, we stay with our eyes open. If the answer is no, we have clarity about what we need to do to take care of ourselves—not to punish them, but to honor our own needs.
Boundaries vs. Walls: The Crucial Distinction
There's a profound difference between healthy boundaries and protective walls, though they can look similar from the outside.
A boundary is a clear statement about what you will and won't accept, what you need to feel safe. Boundaries are flexible and relational—they invite the other person to understand you better. "I need advance notice before visits," or "I can't have conversations when voices are raised"—these are boundaries. They protect your well-being while staying in connection.
Walls are about protection through disconnection. They're built from old wounds and say, "I've decided who you are, so I'm shutting down before you can hurt me." Walls don't invite dialogue; they end it. They feel rigid rather than firm, punitive rather than protective.
The distinction often comes down to intention. Are you creating this limit because you've reflected on what you genuinely need? Or are you reactively shutting down because you're scared of being vulnerable again?
Healthy boundaries make space for imperfection. They acknowledge that someone might sometimes forget or misunderstand—and there's room to address that. Walls assume the worst and don't allow for repair.
The Deepening That Comes Through Disappointment
The moments when people disappoint us are often when relationships become real. When someone shows up imperfectly and we choose to stay present with our disappointment rather than abandoning them or ourselves, something shifts. The relationship stops being an idealized fantasy and becomes something more honest, more durable.
We learn that connection can survive disappointment. That we can feel hurt without making someone all bad. That people can fail us in one way and still be valuable in others.
This is where genuine intimacy lives—not in the absence of disappointment, but in our capacity to hold complexity. To say, "I'm hurt by what you did, and I still care about you," or "This isn't what I hoped for, and I'm going to sit with that before deciding what comes next."
Each time we choose to stay present with relational discomfort rather than fleeing or forcing resolution, we develop emotional capacity. We become people who can hold nuance, tolerate ambiguity, and love without needing others to be perfect.
The art of letting others be human isn't about lowering standards or accepting less than we deserve. It's about releasing the exhausting work of trying to control others' growth and instead focusing on our own—learning to communicate clearly, feel our feelings without dramatizing them, maintain boundaries without building walls, and stay connected to people we love even when they're not showing up the way we wish they would.



Comments